workflow-fix: WARN-only check_ood_folds in verify_plan
Highlight text on any card (body, plan, or an event) to anchor a comment, or leave a whole-task comment here. Mention @claude to summon a reply.
No comments yet.
Overview / Motivation
Auto-filed by /daily 2026-07-03 from a recursion-guard-parked workflow-fix candidate.
Goal
add a WARN-only check_ood_folds keyed on the 'Required: OOD generalization folds' block heading / the 'N/A - no held-out predictive DV' escape line, mirroring check_measurement_validity's shape, with tests/test_verify_plan.py coverage
Workflow gap
- Bug observed: verify_plan has no check for the 'Required: OOD generalization folds' block, so a plan can silently omit the group-level fold declaration
- Why it is a workflow gap: see candidate note
- Confidence (emitter): medium
Proposed change (candidate sketch — refine in planning)
add a WARN-only check_ood_folds keyed on the 'Required: OOD generalization folds' block heading / the 'N/A - no held-out predictive DV' escape line, mirroring check_measurement_validity's shape, with tests/test_verify_plan.py coverage
Scope / surfaces
- Primary target:
scripts/verify_plan.py - Grep the workflow surface for the pattern before editing; list every hit in the plan.
Constraints / invariants
- Workflow-surface only;
scripts/workflow_lint.py --check-askspasses; ruff on touched files passes.
Provenance
- workflow_fix_target: scripts/verify_plan.py
- fingerprint: e757c9c76a81
source: prose-followup (implementer report, plan §11 Decision 6). target_file: scripts/verify_plan.py. proposed_change: add a WARN-only check_ood_folds keyed on the 'Required: OOD generalization folds' block heading / the 'N/A — no held-out predictive DV' escape line, mirroring check_measurement_validity's shape, with tests/test_verify_plan.py coverage. confidence: medium. routed: parked — running under workflow_fix_target recursion guard (.claude/rules/workflow-fix-on-bug.md § Recursion guard); logged for the next human/orchestrator pass, not auto-filed.