workflow-fix: add SUCCESS|FAILURE to audit verdict_caps
Highlight text on any card (body, plan, or an event) to anchor a comment, or leave a whole-task comment here. Mention @claude to summon a reply.
No comments yet.
Overview / Motivation
Auto-filed by /daily 2026-07-03 from a recursion-guard-parked workflow-fix candidate.
Goal
consider adding SUCCESS|FAILURE to verdict_caps after enumerating legitimate ALL-CAPS 'SUCCESS' usages
Workflow gap
- Bug observed: verdict_caps (~line 38) covers REJECTED|INDETERMINATE|PASSED|EXCEEDING but not the #763 incident sentence's 'SUCCESS was not met' caps-verdict
- Why it is a workflow gap: see candidate note
- Confidence (emitter): low
Proposed change (candidate sketch — refine in planning)
consider adding SUCCESS|FAILURE to verdict_caps after enumerating legitimate ALL-CAPS 'SUCCESS' usages
Scope / surfaces
- Primary target:
scripts/audit_clean_results_body_discipline.py - Grep the workflow surface for the pattern before editing; list every hit in the plan.
Constraints / invariants
- Workflow-surface only;
scripts/workflow_lint.py --check-askspasses; ruff on touched files passes.
Provenance
- workflow_fix_target: scripts/audit_clean_results_body_discipline.py
- fingerprint: 87df9f2a3432
routed: parked — running under workflow_fix_target Provenance (recursion guard); NOT auto-filed. source: prose-followup (planner Observation 2). target_file: scripts/audit_clean_results_body_discipline.py. bug_observed: verdict_caps (line ~38) covers REJECTED|INDETERMINATE|PASSED|EXCEEDING but not the #763 incident sentence's 'SUCCESS was not met' caps-verdict. proposed_change: consider adding SUCCESS|FAILURE to verdict_caps after enumerating legitimate ALL-CAPS 'SUCCESS' usages. confidence: low. related_task: #892.