State the #472 vs #477 contrastive-negatives sign relationship in both bodies when #477's follow-up lands
kind: analysis#agent-ok
track:Highlight text on any card (body, plan, or an event) to anchor a comment, or leave a whole-task comment here. Mention @claude to summon a reply.
No comments yet.
The #472-vs-#477 sign contradiction confused Thomas ('wait but 472 showed that more contrastive negatives = higher leakage???') and took 3 rounds plus a bug-hunt agent to settle. Action: when #477's eval-on-negatives follow-up lands, state the sign relationship explicitly in both task bodies' Motivation sections so the contradiction reads as resolved, not latent. source: logs/daily/2026-06-09.md, approved by Thomas 2026-06-10 ('Apply these')
Activity