EPS
← All tasks·#1874Completed

daily-fix: /daily filed bodies cite marker per mechanism cla

kind: infra#wf-fix#wf-fix-fp:25fa51dc0c5b#daily-auto-filed
track:

Highlight text on any card (body, plan, or an event) to anchor a comment, or leave a whole-task comment here. Mention @claude to summon a reply.

No comments yet.

Overview / Motivation

Auto-filed by /daily 2026-07-29 (problem sweep; emitting source: miners C-P1 (#1814) and E-P9 (#1798) — two same-day recurrences of the #1677 class).

Goal

Filed bodies are premises for spawned planners; a mechanism claim without a marker citation or the label reliably burns a critic round.

Workflow gap

  • Bug observed: #1814's body (route-2 driver, 07-28) asserted a single-mechanism story #1738's events do not support (critic REVISE r1, split in v2); #1798's plan v1 inherited an unverified absence claim (critic REVISE r1, dropped in v2).
  • Why it is a workflow gap: the #1677 labeling duty is stated but not mechanically anchored to the miner schema's probed/inferred field — the translation step is where both failures happened.
  • Confidence (emitter): medium
  • verified-at-filing: miner probe (C-P1): grep -n -i 'kresample|12 rows|engine' tasks/running/1814/body.md -> L28 carries the conflated claim verbatim (composed by the filer, not the planner).

Proposed change (refine in planning)

Add to the route-2/3 compose step: a mechanism claim from a miner finding marked 'inferred — not probed' MUST ship as unverified hypothesis — verify at plan time: ...; a probed finding cites the probe command; incident claims cite the marker ts+kind where one exists.

Scope / surfaces

  • Primary target: .claude/skills/daily/SKILL.md
  • Grep the workflow surface for the pattern before editing and update every hit.

Constraints / invariants

  • Workflow-surface only; scripts/workflow_lint.py --check-asks passes; ruff clean on touched files.

Provenance

  • workflow_fix_target: .claude/skills/daily/SKILL.md
  • fingerprint: 25fa51dc0c5b
Activity