EPS Dashboard

Overview / Motivation

Auto-filed by /daily 2026-07-16 Step C from a parked prose candidate on task #1414 (Alternatives critic). #1414 is completed — it landed the rule block but not the critic-surface edit.

Goal

Close the enforcement gap between the #1414 mount-binding rule and the critic lens that is supposed to own it.

Workflow gap

Bug observed: the Methodology-lens items in critic-lens-reference.md do not name out-root mount binding after #1414 landed its plan-compute-sizing rule block — 'critic-owned' enforcement is asserted without a critic-surface edit, so the named owner never reads for it
Why it is a workflow gap: A rule whose named enforcement owner has no matching lens text is unenforced in practice (the lens reference is what the critic composes from).
Confidence (emitter): low (emitter) — concrete file + change, filed per the 2026-06-11 standing directive
verified-at-filing: grep -in 'mount' .claude/rules/critic-lens-reference.md -> 3 hits, all in the measurement-band item (L364/L366/L686) — none about out-root mount binding (absence claim binds); git log --oneline --since='7 days ago' -- .claude/rules/critic-lens-reference.md -> 7a583a417d / f5b533aff2 / 86e8e1a988 (unrelated lens edits, no mount-binding item)

Proposed change (candidate diff sketch — refine in planning)

Add an out-root mount-binding clause to the Methodology lens section-9 compute-sizing item, cross-referencing .claude/rules/plan-compute-sizing.md's #1414 block.

Scope / surfaces

Primary target: .claude/rules/critic-lens-reference.md
Grep the workflow surface for the pattern before editing and update every hit; list them in the plan.

Constraints / invariants

Workflow-surface only — never experiment code, configs/, or tasks/.
scripts/workflow_lint.py --check-asks passes; ruff on touched files passes.
This session runs under a workflow_fix_target: Provenance line — it MUST NOT auto-route its own subagents' workflow-fix candidates (recursion guard).

Provenance

fingerprint: bc04bc5d6dc9