EPS Dashboard

Overview / Motivation

Auto-filed by the /daily 2026-07-15 parked-candidate routing pass (Step C) from a recursion-guard-parked FORMAL candidate block on task #1330 (archived as duplicate of the already-landed #1309 fix — this candidate is about the mis-filing mechanism itself).

Goal

Extend the verified-at-filing binding rule in .claude/rules/workflow-fix-on-bug.md so a presence-grep must bind on CONTEXT as well as count: a hit whose surrounding context already implements the proposed change means the fix is already landed — re-read the hit's context before filing.

Workflow gap

Bug observed: #1330 was filed as a duplicate of the already-landed #1309 fix because the filer's verified-at-filing grep (case-sensitive) hit the existing recipe paragraph itself, yet the hit's CONTEXT was misjudged as unrelated — the binding rule caught count consistency but not context consistency.
Why it is a workflow gap: the § Body-file template's verified-at-filing mandate (#1272/#1307 lineage) binds hit COUNTS to the claim but has no clause requiring the filer to read the hit's context to rule out "the hit IS the fix" — so duplicate filings pass the grep gate.
Confidence (emitter): medium (formal block)
verified-at-filing: grep -c 'verified-at-filing' .claude/rules/workflow-fix-on-bug.md → 5 hits (the mandate exists); grep -n 'context consist\|context-consist' .claude/rules/workflow-fix-on-bug.md → 0 hits (absence-of-guard claim — the 0-hit in-target result IS the evidence) (2026-07-16 UTC)

Proposed change (candidate diff sketch — refine in planning)

Add a context-consistency clause to the binding test in § Body-file template (and the § Anti-patterns table): a presence grep whose hits sit inside text that already implements the proposed change is a landed-fix signal — read each hit's surrounding lines before filing; a count-only bind does not satisfy the mandate.

Scope / surfaces

Primary target: .claude/rules/workflow-fix-on-bug.md
The sibling summary in .claude/skills/daily/SKILL.md (route-2 verified-at-filing mandate paragraph) may need the same one-line extension — grep both.

Constraints / invariants

Workflow-surface only — never experiment code, configs/, or tasks/.
scripts/workflow_lint.py --check-asks passes.
This session runs under EPM_WORKFLOW_FIX_SESSION=1 and carries a workflow_fix_target: Provenance line — it MUST NOT auto-route any of its own subagents' workflow-fix candidates (recursion guard).

Provenance

workflow_fix_target: .claude/rules/workflow-fix-on-bug.md
fingerprint: 1e9027c2d4ba

parked formal candidate (from #1330 events.jsonl 2026-07-15T06:57:11Z, abridged): " target_file: .claude/rules/workflow-fix-on-bug.md bug_observed: #1330 was filed as a duplicate of the already-landed #1309 fix because the filer's verified-at-filing grep (case-sensitive) hit the existing recipe paragraph itself yet the hit's CONTEXT was misjudged as unrelated — the binding rule caught count consistency but not context consistency. why_workflow_gap: the verified-at-fili[ng mandate has no context-consistency clause] ..."