daily-held: settle #779-line mapping terminology + writeup b
kind: infra#daily-held#needs-human
track:Highlight text on any card (body, plan, or an event) to anchor a comment, or leave a whole-task comment here. Mention @claude to summon a reply.
No comments yet.
Overview / Motivation
Auto-filed by /daily 2026-07-04 (route 3: judgment call -> needs-human), from the nightly transcript problem sweep.
Goal
Held for your call (taste/scientific-meaning carve-out): confirm the settled terminology (context vector / query vector / prefix definitions) so it can be captured in the #779-line docs, and confirm the writeup convention that analysis choices (PCA dim, kernel choice) ship with their grounding by default.
Workflow gap
- Bug observed: Thomas re-steered the #779 writeup across ~19 messages on 2026-07-04 (00:48-04:07 UTC): context-vector/query-vector naming (4 messages), per-example specificity, eval-distribution coverage, why PCA=64, whether KRR answers the nonlinearity question. The draft used unsettled terminology and did not pre-justify method choices.
- Why it is a workflow gap: the failure originates in the workflow surface / helper named below, not in any one experiment.
- Confidence (emitter): medium
Scope / surfaces
- Primary target:
docs/ - Session: 9caa26ea (interactive).
Constraints / invariants
- Workflow-surface only;
scripts/workflow_lint.py --check-asks+--check-referencesstay green; ruff clean on touched files.
Provenance
- workflow_fix_target: docs/
- source: /daily 2026-07-04 problem sweep (transcript-mined)