EPS
← All batches·2605.21822

Implicit Safety Alignment from Crowd Preferences

topic: current_projecttop score: 100released: 2026-05-23first surfaced: 2026-05-23arXivPDFthreats2026-05-23

Authors: Qian Lin, Daniel S. Brown

arXiv · PDF

Summary

arXiv:2605. 21822v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) can reveal implicit objectives such as safety considerations that go beyond task completion.

Relevance

Read next because Implicit Safety Alignment from Crowd Preferences overlaps with clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)", clean result "Coupling evil personas with wrong answers fails to protect Qwen2.5-7B from EM-induced alignment collapse — and the apparent capability ordering across coupling conditions is mostly eval contamination (LOW confidence)", clean result "Only continuous soft prefixes hit both EM axes at once on Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct: discrete prompt searches split between the alignment objective and the distributional objective, and both discretizations of the soft prefix collapse (MODERATE confidence)". Matching terms: rect, alignment, rate, without, trained, completion, model. Source: arxiv cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence).

Threat model

Potential threat/caveat for clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)": this item discusses limitation, limitations.

Abstract

arXiv:2605.21822v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) can reveal implicit objectives such as safety considerations that go beyond task completion. In this work, we focus on the common safety criteria embedded in crowd preference datasets, where different users may express distinct preferences or objectives, yet follow similar safety principles. Our aim is to discover shared safety criteria from crowd preferences and then transfer them to downstream RL tasks to regularize agent behavior and enforce safety. We first show that direct reward combination-optimizing a preference-learned reward model together with downstream task rewards-has inherent limitations. Motivated by this, we propose Safe Crowd Preference-based RL, a hierarchical framework that extracts safety-aligned skills from crowd preferences and composes them via a high-level policy to safely solve downstream tasks. Experiments across safe RL environments and a preliminary LLM-style task with diverse user goals and shared safety constraints demonstrate that our approach substantially lowers safety costs without access to explicit safety rewards, while achieving task performance comparable to oracle methods trained with ground-truth safety signals.