EPS
← All batches·2605.17718

How does feature learning reshape the function space?

topic: current_projecttop score: 100released: 2026-05-19first surfaced: 2026-05-19arXivPDFlinked_to_results2026-05-19

Authors: Jo~ao Lobo, Bruno Loureiro, Long Tran-Than et al.

arXiv · PDF

Summary

arXiv:2605. 17718v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Feature learning is widely regarded as the key mechanism distinguishing neural networks from fixed-kernel methods, yet its impact on the induced function space remains poorly understood.

Relevance

Read next because How does feature learning reshape the function space? overlaps with clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)", clean result "Only continuous soft prefixes hit both EM axes at once on Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct: discrete prompt searches split between the alignment objective and the distributional objective, and both discretizations of the soft prefix collapse (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Training one persona to emit a [ZLT] marker without bystanders adopting it has a one-cell-wide LR x epochs window on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (LOW confidence)". Matching terms: rect, under, distributional, does, stage. Source: arxiv stat.ML (Machine Learning).

Abstract

arXiv:2605.17718v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Feature learning is widely regarded as the key mechanism distinguishing neural networks from fixed-kernel methods, yet its impact on the induced function space remains poorly understood. In this work, we precisely characterize how the function space spanned by the features of a two-layer neural network evolves during gradient descent training. We prove that, in the high-dimensional proportional regime, after a large gradient step the post-update feature distribution is well approximated by a target-dependent spiked Gaussian covariance. This induces a data-adaptive kernel that reshapes the function space and modifies its spectral structure. Our analysis reveals that feature learning can be interpreted as a distributional transformation in either parameter space or input space, equivalently as the introduction of a target-dependent kernel. In particular, it selectively amplifies eigenvalues aligned with the target direction and mixes leading eigenfunctions, coupling the top radial mode with a target-aligned quadratic harmonic. Overall, our results provide a precise function-space perspective on early-stage feature learning: rather than just rescaling a fixed kernel, gradient descent induces a data-adaptive deformation that preferentially enhances directions aligned with the signal in the data.