EPS
← All batches·2605.15934

Privacy is Fungibility: Why Endogenous Tokens Are Not Money

topic: current_projecttop score: 100released: 2026-05-18first surfaced: 2026-05-18arXivPDFlinked_to_results2026-05-18

Authors: Alex Lynham, Geoffrey Goodell

arXiv · PDF

Summary

arXiv:2605. 15934v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we make a case that endogenous tokens such as cryptoassets are not money.

Relevance

Read next because Privacy is Fungibility: Why Endogenous Tokens Are Not Money overlaps with clean result "Leakage rate is a usable signal for recovering trigger-shaped phrases on Gaperon-1125-1B without knowing the hidden trigger itself (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)", clean result "A pretraining-data-poisoned Qwen3-4B backdoor only fires on the exact trigger tokens — paraphrases don't activate it, and base-model similarity to the trigger doesn't predict which inputs fire (MODERATE confidence)". Matching terms: class, token, rate, chain, model. Source: arxiv cs.CR (Cryptography and Security).

Abstract

arXiv:2605.15934v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we make a case that endogenous tokens such as cryptoassets are not money. First, we define and classify tokens found on public, permissionless ledgers, contrasting them with privately issued stablecoins and proposed CBDC designs. We then discuss the work of Kahn et al in Money is Privacy on cash versus simplified credit, and we extend their analysis to the situation found on most public, permissionless ledgers. Many public, permissionless ledgers utilize an account-based abstraction for balances, resulting in a default state that maps onto the most harmful models of agent interaction enumerated in Money is Privacy. The conclusion is threefold: that most blockchain economies lack a cash-like primitive; that stablecoins do not intrinsically fulfil this role; and that the reliance of a network on an endogenous token for security exposes holders even of a privacy-preserving asset to the same risk, if that asset relies on the same global ledger state as the endogenous token.