EPS
← All batches·2605.15365

Greedy or not, here I come: Language production under vocabulary constraints in humans and resource-rational models

topic: current_projecttop score: 100released: 2026-05-18first surfaced: 2026-05-18arXivPDFthreats2026-05-18

Authors: Thomas Hikaru Clark, Sihan Chen, Laura Nicolae

arXiv · PDF

Summary

arXiv:2605. 15365v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Communicating using only a limited vocabulary is a common but challenging cognitive phenomenon, requiring an ideal communicator to plan carefully to optimize for intelligibility while circumventing a constrained lexicon.

Relevance

Read next because Greedy or not, here I come: Language production under vocabulary constraints in humans and resource-rational models overlaps with clean result "Leakage rate is a usable signal for recovering trigger-shaped phrases on Gaperon-1125-1B without knowing the hidden trigger itself (MODERATE confidence)", clean result "Language-mismatch LoRA SFT on Qwen2.5-7B leaks the trained completion language into bystander directives the model was never trained on, absent under same-language SFT (LOW confidence)", clean result "Training one persona to emit a [ZLT] marker without bystanders adopting it has a one-cell-wide LR x epochs window on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct (LOW confidence)". Matching terms: word, under, source, full, trained, language, model. Source: arxiv cs.CL (NLP).

Threat model

Potential threat/caveat for clean result "Leakage rate is a usable signal for recovering trigger-shaped phrases on Gaperon-1125-1B without knowing the hidden trigger itself (MODERATE confidence)": this item discusses limitation, limitations.

Abstract

arXiv:2605.15365v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Communicating using only a limited vocabulary is a common but challenging cognitive phenomenon, requiring an ideal communicator to plan carefully to optimize for intelligibility while circumventing a constrained lexicon. In this work, we investigate how humans respond to a broad array of questions under variable vocabulary limitations, consisting of only 250 highly frequent words at the most restrictive. We provide theoretically motivated comparisons to greedy and globally optimal sampling algorithms using Sequential Monte Carlo inference with large language models. Humans generally resemble greedy sampling more than globally optimal sampling, though more skilled humans are more likely to backtrack and revise -- a non-greedy behavior. An observed human pattern of leaning on semantically light words in high-constraint settings falls out of both greedy and globally optimal sampling. We discuss the results and their broader implications for resource-rational cognition, psycholinguistics, L2 communication, and language impairments.